Review in Brief: Jackie (2016)

Natalie Portman is pretty near perfect as Jackie Kennedy. There’s nowhere to hide with her forever centre-frame and sometimes uncomfortably close up when she is at her most vulnerable. I would have preferred more scenes with the priest (sadly not possible with the terminally ill John Hurt in the role) to allow for a real contrast of Jackie’s personas. You could have had two juxtaposed versions of events with the First Lady’s public and private images dominating each telling of the day of the assassination. I was also a bit disappointed that they felt JFK’s shooting itself needed to be depicted, especially following Jackie’s earlier affronted query to Billy Crudup’s journalist, “I suppose you want a blow-by-blow?”. In the end that’s exactly what we get, and it just isn’t necessary. Far more interesting are the private scenes where Jackie obsessively crafts her image and tries to keep it all together with the world watching when all she really wants to do is let go and grieve. SSP

About Sam Sewell-Peterson

I'm not paid to write about film - I do it because I love it. Favourites include Sam Mendes, Guillermo del Toro, Bong Joon-ho, Steven Spielberg, Danny Boyle, Edgar Wright, Taika Waititi and the Coen Brothers. All reviews and articles are original works owned by me. They represent one man's opinion, and I'm more than happy to engage in civilised debate if you disagree.
This entry was posted in Film, Film Review and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s